Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E80569BF5 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74379 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2012 01:30:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 74283 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2012 01:30:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 74273 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2012 01:30:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:30:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:30:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A434344CAD for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:30:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sebb (Issue Comment Edited) (JIRA)" To: issues@commons.apache.org Message-ID: <720926756.15720.1332725428109.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1125499437.25409.1331917426164.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (CSV-70) Improve readability of CSVLexer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CSV-70?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13238039#comment-13238039 ] Sebb edited comment on CSV-70 at 3/26/12 1:29 AM: -------------------------------------------------- Yes, I tried something similar and it broke the tests. I think it would be useful to provide (optional) access to the comment fields so one way to solve this would be to return the comment as a token, and deal with it at the record level. was (Author: sebb@apache.org): Yes, I tried something similar and it broke the tests. I think it would be useful to provide (optional) access to the comment fields so one way to solve this would be to return the comment as a token, and deal will it at the record level. > Improve readability of CSVLexer > ------------------------------- > > Key: CSV-70 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CSV-70 > Project: Commons CSV > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Parser > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Benedikt Ritter > Fix For: 1.0 > > > There are several things that can be improved in the token lexer (this has also been discussed on ML, see http://markmail.org/thread/c6x5ji4v44nx5k4h): > * Remove Token input parameter in nextToken() > * Add convenience methods isDelimiter(c) and isEncapsulator(c) > * Remove current caracter input parameter from methods > * If possible: replace while(true) loops -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira