commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "david cogen (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LANG-769) Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException
Date Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:37:51 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13149772#comment-13149772
] 

david cogen commented on LANG-769:
----------------------------------

Forgot to add:
At the very least, these should have been deprecated rather than just removing them without
warning. But as I said before, these are generally useful and I'd love to have them back.
                
> Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LANG-769
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: david cogen
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Why were these removed? I found these very useful and used them often. As the version
2.6 api javadoc states, "This exception supplements the standard exception classes by providing
a more semantically rich description of the problem."
> Just want you to realize that these have found direct use outside the library; not just
internal use within commons-lang.
> I will define these missing classes myself, or maybe include both commons-lang and commons-lang3
(but I really don't to do that). It would be very nice to have these back.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message