Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C44B7CF8 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29955 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2011 08:57:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 29451 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2011 08:57:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 28777 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2011 08:56:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:56:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:56:31 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF8C829CD for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:56:10 +0000 (UTC) From: "Maurizio Cucchiara (JIRA)" To: issues@commons.apache.org Message-ID: <1546250690.19498.1315299370193.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <872907710.17472.1315239251255.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (OGNL-20) Performance - Replace synchronized blocks with ReentrantReadWriteLock MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13097814#comment-13097814 ] Maurizio Cucchiara commented on OGNL-20: ---------------------------------------- Hi Julien, that was my original thought, furthermore we could use putIfAbsent method of CHM. What do you think, guys? Anyway we should discuss about it in just one issue. > Performance - Replace synchronized blocks with ReentrantReadWriteLock > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OGNL-20 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-20 > Project: OGNL > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: ALL > Reporter: Greg Lively > > I've noticed a lot of synchronized blocks of code in OGNL. For the most part, these synchronized blocks are controlling access to HashMaps, etc. I believe this could be done far better using ReentrantReadWriteLocks. ReentrantReadWriteLock allows unlimited concurrent access, and single threads only for writes. Perfect in an environment where the ratio of reads is far higher than writes; which is typically the scenario for caching. Plus the access control can be tuned for reads and writes; not just a big synchronized{} wrapping a bunch of code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira