commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adrian Crum (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OGNL-20) Performance - Replace synchronized blocks with ReentrantReadWriteLock
Date Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:12:10 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13097868#comment-13097868
] 

Adrian Crum commented on OGNL-20:
---------------------------------

I highly recommend reading Java Concurrency In Practice (http://www.amazon.com/Java-Concurrency-Practice-Brian-Goetz/dp/0321349601/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1315303458&sr=8-1)
and Concurrent Programming In Java (http://www.amazon.com/Concurrent-Programming-Java-Principles-Pattern/dp/0201310090/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1315303737&sr=1-1)
- a book written by the author of ConcurrentHashMap.



> Performance - Replace synchronized blocks with ReentrantReadWriteLock
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OGNL-20
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-20
>             Project: OGNL
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>         Environment: ALL
>            Reporter: Greg Lively
>
> I've noticed a lot of synchronized blocks of code in OGNL. For the most part, these synchronized
blocks are controlling access to HashMaps, etc. I believe this could be done far better using
ReentrantReadWriteLocks. ReentrantReadWriteLock allows unlimited concurrent access, and single
threads only for writes. Perfect in an environment where the ratio of reads  is far higher
than writes; which is typically the scenario for caching. Plus the access control can be tuned
for reads and writes; not just a big synchronized{} wrapping a bunch of code.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message