Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 08:08:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Sai Zhang (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@commons.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <254727355.31002.1301818085754.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Created] (PRIMITIVES-16) Bug in class#ShortList/DoubleList
 (?) with reproducible JUnit test
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bug in class#ShortList/DoubleList (?) with reproducible JUnit test
------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: PRIMITIVES-16
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PRIMITIVES-16
             Project: Commons Primitives
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 1.0
         Environment: jdk 1.6.0
            Reporter: Sai Zhang
         Attachments: ApachePrimitive_Documented_Test.java

Hi all:


I am writing an automated bug finding tool, and using
Apache Commons Primitives as an experimental subject
for evaluation.

The tool creates executable JUnit tests as well as
explanatory code comments. I attached one bug-revealing
test as follows. Could you please kindly check it, to
see if it is a real bug or not?

Also, it would be tremendous helpful if you could give
some feedback and suggestion on the quality of generated code comments?
Is the automatically-inferred comment useful in understanding
the generated test? is the comment helpful in bug fixing?
Particularly when the automatically-generated tests
are often long.

Your suggestion will help us improve the tool.

Please see attachment for the failed test.


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira