commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Luc Maisonobe (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (MATH-478) FastMath is not an exact replacement for StrictMath
Date Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:08:43 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12985293#action_12985293
] 

Luc Maisonobe commented on MATH-478:
------------------------------------

nextAfter part fixed in subversion repository as of r1062385 for branch 2.X and as of r1062387
for trunk


> FastMath is not an exact replacement for StrictMath
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-478
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-478
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Sebb
>
> FastMath Javadoc says:
> "Faster, more accurate, portable alternative to StrictMath."
> However, it does not implement the following StrictMath methods:
> hypot(double, double)
> IEEEremainder(double, double)
> Nor the following, though it probably should:
> signum(float)
> ulp(float)
> FastMath implements the following additional methods:
> acosh(double)
> asinh(double)
> atanh(double)
> nextAfter(double, double)
> nextUp(double)
> I think this should be documented.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message