Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org
Message-ID: <28407474.154371288414581945.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:56:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Gary Gregory (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@commons.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Created: (POOL-178) Common interfaces and abstract classes
 for BOP and BKOP
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Common interfaces and abstract classes for BOP and BKOP
-------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: POOL-178
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-178
             Project: Commons Pool
          Issue Type: Improvement
    Affects Versions: Nightly Builds
            Reporter: Gary Gregory
             Fix For: 2.0
         Attachments: POOL-178.diff

I have created a patch that IMO should make it easier for us to further refactor code.

In brief, OP/BOP and KOP/BKOP do not have a common parent interface/class. This patch remedies this by pulling up the close/clear/getNumActive/getNumIdle methods into a new interface and class.

This seems not very controversial (to me at least), so I would like to commit it (unless riots spread from Paris to this list.)

Thoughts?


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.