Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66424 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2010 17:35:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Mar 2010 17:35:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 49394 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 17:35:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 49220 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 17:35:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 49210 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2010 17:35:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:35:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1094.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:35:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA40234C4B9 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <192707206.407661269279327370.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:35:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Niall Pemberton (JIRA)" To: issues@commons.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (BEANUTILS-362) Add serialVersionUID to Serializable classes In-Reply-To: <902060286.1252337392766.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848220#action_12848220 ] Niall Pemberton commented on BEANUTILS-362: ------------------------------------------- I doubt many (if any) are going to be trying to de-serialize from a previous version - I expect they are usually short lived. Also the implication from this ticket is that different JVM implementations could calculate different values - if thats true then theres little value in setting them to whatever JVM implementation I'm using. Anyone else got an opinion on whether this is OK to stay or we should just revert the change and close this ticket as WONTFIX? > Add serialVersionUID to Serializable classes > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: BEANUTILS-362 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-362 > Project: Commons BeanUtils > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sebb > Assignee: Niall Pemberton > Fix For: 1.8.3 > > Attachments: beanutils-362.diff > > > The following classes are Serializable, but don't have serialVersionUID defined: > BasicDynaBean > BasicDynaClass > DynaProperty > LazyDynaBean > LazyDynaList > Performance (and JVM interoperability) would be improved by adding the UIDs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.