Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20017 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2010 20:06:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Mar 2010 20:06:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 49322 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2010 20:06:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 49245 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2010 20:06:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 49237 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2010 20:06:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:06:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1165.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:06:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D916234C4AE for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <181724220.557981269893188185.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:06:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "James Carman (JIRA)" To: issues@commons.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (CODEC-96) Base64 encode() method is no longer thread-safe, breaking clients using it as a shared BinaryEncoder In-Reply-To: <286014533.546751267160427969.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851068#action_12851068 ] James Carman commented on CODEC-96: ----------------------------------- Use a ThreadLocal? > Base64 encode() method is no longer thread-safe, breaking clients using it as a shared BinaryEncoder > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CODEC-96 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96 > Project: Commons Codec > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.4 > Reporter: Matt Ryall > Attachments: codec-96-2nd-attempt.patch > > > Streaming support was added to Base64 in commons-codec 1.4 with CODEC-69. This introduced instance variables to Base64 which means the class can no longer be used as a shared BinaryEncoder instance. > For example, BinaryEncoder has an interface which could be (and was) used like this with Base64: > {code:java} > class Example { > private BinaryEncoder encoder = new Base64(); > byte[] someMethod(byte[] data) { > try { > return encoder.encode(data); > } > catch (EncoderException e) { > throw new RuntimeException(e); > } > } > } > {code} > Base64 is no longer thread-safe in commons-codec 1.4, so code like the above which is accessed by multiple threads can throw NullPointerException: > {noformat} > java.lang.NullPointerException > at org.apache.commons.codec.binary.Base64.encode(Base64.java:469) > at org.apache.commons.codec.binary.Base64.encode(Base64.java:937) > at ... (application code) > {noformat} > Looking at the implementation of Base64, I think making it thread-safe for this kind of usage would be quite tricky. I haven't attempted to prepare a patch. > I would be happy if it was indicated in the Javadoc that Base64 is not thread-safe and should not be shared. However, some other users of commons-codec might be more worried about this regression. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.