Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22168 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2010 17:59:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2010 17:59:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 9655 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2010 17:59:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 9555 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2010 17:59:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 9545 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2010 17:59:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:59:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:59:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97574234C052 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:59:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1693308644.154471265738368618.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:59:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Roger BAll (JIRA)" To: issues@commons.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (MATH-341) Test for firsst Derivative in PolynomialFunction ERROR In-Reply-To: <89068169.78761265402067954.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12831561#action_12831561 ] Roger BAll commented on MATH-341: --------------------------------- Regarding: "So I think there is only a documentation problem: we should warn the user about extracting coefficients in this implementation. Do you agree with this analysis ?" Certainly a documentation problem. However, if the coefficients do not result in a curve expression that is valid of the entire range of values for which the curve expression is derived then the curve expression is not really useful in a practical sense. I also the erractic occillations in curve. These occillations are HUGE when comparred to the data. Therefore the expression is not all together valid. > Test for firsst Derivative in PolynomialFunction ERROR > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: MATH-341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-341 > Project: Commons Math > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 2.0 > Reporter: Roger BAll > Attachments: FirstDerivativePolyNomTest.java > > > I have written the attached test using our data for generating a curve function > However the first derivative test fails see: testfirstDerivativeComparisonFullPower > Either my test is in error or there is a bug in PolynomialFunction class. > Roger Ball > Creoss Business Solutions -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.