Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org
Message-ID: <225542596.1250103914860.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Boris (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@commons.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (LANG-481) Possible race-conditions in hashCode of
 the range classes
In-Reply-To: <257814446.1232740199743.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Boris updated LANG-481:
-----------------------

    Attachment: LANG-481.patch

Possible patch to this issue.
This uses the same technique used elsewhere in commons-lang. Using a non-volatile field to cache the value (in the worst case it may be calculated every time, in the best case only once) and calculating the value on a temp variable so that there is never an inconsistent value stored in the field.

> Possible race-conditions in hashCode of the range classes
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LANG-481
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-481
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Boris
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>         Attachments: LANG-481.patch
>
>
> The hashCode() methods of the range classes look very suspicious to me. The value is lazily initialized, but the calculation is done _on the cached value. With some unlucky timing a caller may get an incomplete hash.
> An unlucky sequence of Code could be something like
> T1:        if (hashCode == 0) // true
> T1:            hashCode = 17;
> T2:         if (hashCode == 0) // now false because hashCode was already set to 17
> T2:         return hashCode; // return 17
> T1:            hashCode = 37 * hashCode...........
> where T1 and T2 are different threads accessing the method in parallel and T2 gets the wrong hash "17".
> Affected classes are
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.DoubleRange
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.FloatRange
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.IntRange
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.LongRange
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.NumberRange
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.Range
> Possible fix: calculate the hash on a temporary variable and finally assign it to the member

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.