Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96355 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2009 10:59:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Aug 2009 10:59:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 84940 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2009 10:59:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 84837 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2009 10:59:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 84826 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2009 10:59:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:59:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:59:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DEF234C044 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1703763865.1250765954814.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:59:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sebb (JIRA)" To: issues@commons.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (JEXL-85) 2.0 grammar finishing touches & debugger update In-Reply-To: <1640188003.1250270354896.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12745389#action_12745389 ] Sebb commented on JEXL-85: -------------------------- Sorry, but I think there are far too many changes in the patch. It's really difficult to follow the patch, and it will be difficult to follow the SVN history. I think the patch needs to be broken down into more manageable chunks. Also, there needs to be a vote on whether it makes sense to change the behaviour of an Expression so that it behaves like a Script. > 2.0 grammar finishing touches & debugger update > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: JEXL-85 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-85 > Project: Commons JEXL > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Henri Biestro > Fix For: 2.0 > > Attachments: JEXL-85.patch, JEXL-85.patch, JEXL-85.patch, JEXL-85.patch > > > The Parser.jjt carries some extras that are not (longer) necessary (the "debug" field, NODE_USES_PARSER option). > Tthe {Expression,Statement,Reference}Expression dont need to create real nodes. > There are a few places where the LOOKAHEAD can be reduced or more explicit. > Some expressions (Reference) are really hard to read partly due to formatting. > The Debugger is also out of sync with the latest grammar updates (Map literals, for). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.