Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org
Message-ID: <1002190546.1248271875007.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Rahul Akolkar (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@commons.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (JEXL-35) Final API requirements
In-Reply-To: <7923649.1193553050564.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734122#action_12734122 ] 

Rahul Akolkar commented on JEXL-35:
-----------------------------------

Heads up that I'm traveling this week and won't be able to look at any JEXL patches till am back (so, looking at  mid next week time frame unless someone else volunteers here).


> Final API requirements
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: JEXL-35
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-35
>             Project: Commons JEXL
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>            Reporter: dion gillard
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>         Attachments: JEXL-35.patch
>
>
> Which classes should be public?
> Is the package structure reasonable? 
> Are classes in the right packages?
> Is it easily extensible?
> ...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.