commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Stefka (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (MATH-207) Implementation of GeneticAlgorithm.nextGeneration() is wrong
Date Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:47:50 GMT


David Stefka commented on MATH-207:

ad 1) what do you mean by "file a CLA"? Should I include the license header (e.g. in
to every file in the framework? I do own the code and I agree with the Apache license (
ad 2) okay, i will try to make it Java 1.5+ compatible

BTW, I am currently working on a better way of representing permutations, so do not include
the original patch now. I will post here a revised version of the implementation in a week
or so.

> Implementation of GeneticAlgorithm.nextGeneration() is wrong
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: MATH-207
>                 URL:
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>            Reporter: David Stefka
>            Assignee: Phil Steitz
>             Fix For: 2.0
>         Attachments: geneticalgorithm.patch,, patch
>   Original Estimate: 0.17h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0.17h
> The implementation of GeneticAlgorithm.nextGeneration() is wrong, since the only way
how a Chromosome can get into the new generation is by mutation. 
> Enclosed, I am sending a patch for this.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message