commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sebb (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (COMPRESS-61) ArchiveStreamFactory could have static methods as well
Date Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:23:50 GMT


Sebb commented on COMPRESS-61:

I see now that I was not entirely clear.

I was not proposing a singleton - that would not make sense.
Nor was I proposing a public static accessor for the singleton - that would just make access
more unwieldy.

The suggestion of using a private static instance was just one way to implement the proposed
static methods.


private static final privateInstance = new ArchiveStreamFactory();

public static ArchiveInputStream getArchiveInputStream(...){
   return privateInstance.createArchiveInputStream(...)

I agree that static fields are often a problem, but that is not the case if the field is final
and the object is immutable.

> ArchiveStreamFactory could have static methods as well
> ------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: COMPRESS-61
>                 URL:
>             Project: Commons Compress
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Sebb
> ArchiveStreamFactory currently has to be instantiated in order to use it.
> The methods have to be instance methods in order for subclasses to override them, but
until that is done (will it ever be done?) it seems a bit unnecessary to create an instance
of the class.
> Perhaps there could be a private static instance of the class that could be used with
public static methods?
> The same considerations apply to the other factories.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message