commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ingmar Kliche (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SCXML-98) TestCases should use SCXMLParser
Date Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:05:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12652996#action_12652996
] 

Ingmar Kliche commented on SCXML-98:
------------------------------------

I agree that we should leave a couple of test cases for the digester. My proposal is

1) to change the getExecutor() implementations (of SCXMLTestHelper) to use the parser and

2) to move all digester test cases into the single (specifically named) "SCXMLDigesterTest"
class

We may want to implement the same test cases (which we leave for the digester) for the parser.
Would we want to have separate SCXML documents in this case for the digester and the parser
test cases (i.e. a microwave01_digester.xml and a microwave01.xml)?

> TestCases should use SCXMLParser
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SCXML-98
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-98
>             Project: Commons SCXML
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.9
>            Reporter: Ingmar Kliche
>             Fix For: 0.10
>
>
> The SCXMLParser implements the latest SCXML parsing rules, whereas the SCXMLDigester
is deprecated. But a lot of testcases still rely on the SCXMLDigester (indirectly) by using
SCXMLTestHelper::getExecutor(url). The testHelper implementation should use the SCXMLParser.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message