commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Carman (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (PROXY-11) slf4j-like discovery of the Proxy implementation to use
Date Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:01:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROXY-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12645186#action_12645186
] 

James Carman commented on PROXY-11:
-----------------------------------

Any other thoughts on this?  I don't plan on changing this paradigm until Proxy 2.0 (which
will probably include some API changes also, so the build changing is the least of my worries).

> slf4j-like discovery of the Proxy implementation to use
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PROXY-11
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROXY-11
>             Project: Commons Proxy
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.0
>         Environment: wicket
>            Reporter: Johan Compagner
>
> I set this prio to major but for wicket it is really a blocker. In the current state
i just cant use commons proxy
> I dont want in a general framework to make a decission which implementation that i should
use
> Something like this  should be done outside the code or at least outside my code  (that
slf4j or commons logging also do)
> Look at how slf4j does it because the commons logging way is a bit flawed (classloading
problems)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message