commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matt Benson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SANDBOX-232) IsElementOf predicate behaves in opposition to semantic implication
Date Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:36:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12587987#action_12587987
] 

Matt Benson commented on SANDBOX-232:
-------------------------------------

Hmm... perhaps this is a "six of one, half-dozen of the other" situation.

Time for a new programming language that mimics human language by having different syntax
for different "parts of speech".  Oooh...

Anyway, I'm prepared to let this one go, but frighteningly I'm intrigued by the idea I've
expressed above...

Going, going...

> IsElementOf predicate behaves in opposition to semantic implication
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SANDBOX-232
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-232
>             Project: Commons Sandbox
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Functor
>            Reporter: Matt Benson
>
> It is my opinion that semantically, "IsElementOf(foo, bar)" translates into English as
"bar is an element of foo"; however this BinaryPredicate is actually coded such that the translation
is "foo is an element of bar".  This comes down to an opinion question, so I'd like for interested
parties to weigh in on this one before I make the requested change.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message