commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Joerg Schaible (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CONFIGURATION-317) Version conflict on dependence for commons-collections
Date Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:13:25 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12579355#action_12579355
] 

Joerg Schaible commented on CONFIGURATION-317:
----------------------------------------------

IIRC this issue has been reported as bug of the assembly plugin. While I understand your position
very well, your suggestion is imply not manageable. Suppose that we release lang 2.5. Then
we would have to release immediately a lot of other commons components as well. And the next
user might argue, since all those artifacts are delivered by the ASF ... ;-)

The referenced version always states the version of a dependent artifact the release was tested
against. Whether another version of the dependency really works cannot be answered easily,
especially since it would require to test the same project at least against the available
versions of all directly used dependencies (and any permutation of it). It is again simply
not manageable.

> Version conflict on dependence for commons-collections
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CONFIGURATION-317
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-317
>             Project: Commons Configuration
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Build
>    Affects Versions: 1.4, 1.5
>         Environment: Seen on Windows XP but should be platform independant
>            Reporter: Olivier Vierlinck
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Based on the pom.xml files:
> commons config (1.4 and 1.5) depends on commons colletions ** 3.2 **  and on commons-beanutils
1.7
> Unfortunately commons-beanutils 1.7depends on commons-collection ** 2.0 **
> I know this kind of jar version clash is not unusual with java/Maven. I know also we
can fix it with <dependencyManagement> instruction in maven.
> However, i experienced trouble when using the assembly:assembly project, which does not
seem to take into account my <dependencyManagement>.
> But as all these project are coming from apache-commons, I think it would be nice if
they all fit together, with a coherent version choice. Probably just uprading beanutils so
that it depends on commons-collection 3.2 would work and solve this (I didn't test that)
> i consider this issue as a general comment on common, to have better version management,
possibly using ranges (for example if beanutils has been tested succesfully with commons-collections
from 2.0 to 3.2)
> What do you think?
> Cheers and thanks for all the work and tools you gave us
> Olivier

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message