commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Oberhuber (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (NET-73) [net][PATCH] hangs when socket data ends in a command sequence
Date Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:21:40 GMT


Martin Oberhuber commented on NET-73:

Darn, it seems to be missing on the NET_2_0 branch indeed... and this has been detected before,
see NET-179 : Looks like that one needs to get

> [net][PATCH] hangs when socket data ends in a command sequence
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: NET-73
>                 URL:
>             Project: Commons Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: Operating System: other
> Platform: All
>            Reporter: Rob Hasselbaum
>         Attachments: cmd-seq-hang.patch
> Background: If one calls in single-threaded mode (no 
> reader thread) and there is no data immediately available, the call blocks on 
> a socket read. When data starts to arrive, the stream adds all the available 
> bytes to its internal queue before returning the first one to the caller. To 
> do this, it calls __read() in a loop for as long as there are bytes available. 
> The __read() method returns the first byte of "user data" from the socket. If 
> __read() encounters a Telnet command sequence (IAC, WILL, WONT, DO, DONT, 
> etc.), it handles the negotiation transparently and then returns the first 
> byte of user data.
> In most cases, this works fine, but a problem arises if a chunk of data from 
> the remote host ends in a Telnet command sequence. When that happens, the 
> method hangs, even though it may have already 
> acquired some user data. This is because it calls __read() in a loop as long 
> as super.available() returns true. But if the remaining data from the socket 
> consists entirely of Telnet commands, __read() will process those AND THEN 
> BLOCK waiting for user data.
> Just checking super.available() is not sufficient. We should continue the loop 
> only if there are bytes of USER DATA still available from the socket. Not 
> doing this can cause the client to wait indefinitely.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message