commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Phil Steitz (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (MATH-187) MatrixUtils - are these supposed to have a public or package scope constructor?
Date Mon, 04 Feb 2008 04:49:08 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565268#action_12565268
] 

Phil Steitz commented on MATH-187:
----------------------------------

The comment is wrong.  The constructor is public and needs to stay that way, though at this
point we could deprecate it.

> MatrixUtils - are these supposed to have a public or package scope constructor?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-187
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-187
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sebb
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Package or public?
> {code}
>     /**
>      * Default constructor.  Package scope to prevent unwanted instantiation. 
>      */
>     public MatrixUtils() {
>         super();
>     }
> {code}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message