commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matt Benson (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (IO-132) File Listener/Monitor
Date Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:48:43 GMT


Matt Benson commented on IO-132:

Huge delay; my email's been _very_ backed up, but I thought this was a good idea as well.

> File Listener/Monitor
> ---------------------
>                 Key: IO-132
>                 URL:
>             Project: Commons IO
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Niall Pemberton
>            Assignee: Niall Pemberton
>             Fix For: 1.4
>         Attachments:,,,,,,,,,,
> Commons JCI has a "fam" (file alteration monitor) module[1] which provides a listener
for file and directory create/change/delete events. I have done some work refactoring the
JCI implementation and propose adding to to Commons IO. There is already an existing request/propsal
to add similar functionality in IO-79 from Jim Harrington (which includes code).
> There are IMO two main differences (IMO improvements) in this implementation over exsiting
JCI fam module:
> 1) It uses a matching array technique to compare previous and current directory contents
which minimizes object creation
> 2) FileFilters can be specified to monitor only portions of the file system, ignoring
files/directories of no interest. This is more efficient and reduces the amount of noise from
un-wanted file/directory events
> From a quick look at IO-79, the above also applies to that proposal. Additionally IMO
the solution in IO-79 would benefit from been broken out from the two DirectoryPoller and
FilePoller artifacts.
> There are also some changes to the API specified in JCI's fam:
> 1) FileObserver (FilesystemAlterationObserver in fam) has additional init() and destroy()
> 2) FileMonitor (FilesystemAlterationMonitor in fam) has addObserver/removeObserver methods
rather than addListener/removeListener methods. The issue (IMO) with fam is that the monitor
is fixed to the FilesystemAlterationObserverImpl implementation, rather than any FilesystemAlterationObserver
implementation. Also the ability to specify file filters means that there is a need to be
able to add more than one observer for the same root directory.
> [1]

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message