commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sebb (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Resolved: (LANG-367) FastDateFormat thread safety
Date Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:55:50 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Sebb resolved LANG-367.
-----------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Sorry, was misreading the usage of SimpleDataFormat.

The class is only instantiated to obtain its pattern as a String - so there is no sharing
of SDF instances.

The remarks about sharing SDF instances are wrong.

> FastDateFormat thread safety
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: LANG-367
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-367
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sebb
>             Fix For: 2.4
>
>         Attachments: FastDateFormat.patch
>
>
> FastDateFormat has several static HashMaps. These are currently not final, so there is
no guarantee that they will be visible to all threads.
> Patch to follow.
> Also, as far as I can make out, the class shares SimpleDateFormat instances between threads.
> It does not document why this is OK.
> I'm guessing that it assumes that instances of the SimpleDateFormat class are thread-safe
provided that they have the same attributes, but this is not documented. If this is the case,
it's not clear that it is a valid assumption.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message