Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
From: Rob Tompkins <chtompki@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 19:27:00 -0500
Subject: Re: Linear Programming in Math Commons and Happy New Year
Message-Id: <3FD47587-4297-47B0-92D0-B8FA8A9556A9@gmail.com>
References: <CACSOW2hVNO4Z_P3VbbnUV5sWbORvazvLXXmST2+t1G1Ds80e-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACSOW2hVNO4Z_P3VbbnUV5sWbORvazvLXXmST2+t1G1Ds80e-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
archived-at: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:27:15 -0000


> On Jan 1, 2018, at 7:08 PM, Bill Igoe <billigoe@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hi Gang,
>=20
> I noted a recent exchange on OLS regarding Math Commons.  Thus far I find
> the Math Commons working flawlessly.  I am also working on a project for
> pure real time financial optimization using the Linear Programming
> algorithm of Math commons.  I designed my code to flip between the QSOPT
> package and the Math common LP algo to check the robustness and consistenc=
y
> of  results.   I get exactly same answers in both and that LP is using ove=
r
> 2000 variables and 3000 constraints!

Many thanks for the encouragement.

All - any thoughts on trying to do a release on [math] is the 3.X branch sta=
ble? Are there any small bug fixes we can do to make small incremental chang=
es and release those?

-Rob

>=20
> Keep up the good work and I am looking forward to the 'split' between
> Commons Math and Statistics.
>=20
>=20
> Cheers to you all and have a great 2018
>=20
> Bill Igoe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org