commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 based on RC3
Date Sat, 23 Dec 2017 01:14:27 GMT
Yeah, we'll try to prepare a 0.6 release to verify all those missing
details before moving to 1.0 somewhen in 2018.

Thanks for all the votes! I'll send inmediatelly the result mail.

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita <kinow@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1 didn't take into consideration it was still a 0.x release. And happy to
> test it again or review pull requests later.
> ThanksBruno
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>
>   On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 at 7:57, ajs6f<ajs6f@apache.org> wrote:   I have
> some PRs in now for some of these issues, which I mention merely as
> reassurance that they will get looked at.
>
> ajs6f
>
> > On Dec 21, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@gmx.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bruno,
> >
> > Am Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:53:35 +0000 schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> I went through the  FindBugs/PMD reports in each module, and found the
> >> following warnings:
> >>
> >>
> >> * main module:
> >>    - Double checked locking is not thread safe in Java. (saw it in
> >>    another part, not sure if it's really possibe to fix as we need
> >>    cannot create a model twice...)
> >>
> >> * commons-df-api:
> >>    - Initialization of org.apache.commons.rdf.api.RDFSyntax accesses
> >>    class
> >> org.apache.commons.rdf.api.W3CRDFSyntax, which isn't initialized yet
> >> (this one seems easy to reproduce. Always returns null?)
> >>
> >> * commons-rdf-simple:
> >>    - org.apache.commons.rdf.simple.DatasetGraphView.unionOrNamedGraph()
> >>    has Optional return type and returns explicit null (shouldn't it be
> >>    Optional.empty() or something similar?)
> >>
> >>
> >> Are any of these blockers? The second one is the only one that if
> >> confirmed seems annoying to users.
> >>
> >>
> >> Everything looks OK, and I'm OK to vote to release in case others think
> >> this release is not actually causing any of these warnings, and that we
> >> should release as-is and fix it later.
> >
> > Since it it a 0.5 release, we can address that later. So, do you vote?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jörg
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message