commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Spero <>
Subject Re: [LANG] Add
Date Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:14:08 GMT
[In regards to original question, -0.0  (harmless, but pointless, since
applications should not use lang as a jpms module. To be usable as a jpms
module, EVERY  release that has ANY api change must use new module and
package names).[1]  ]

Since all dependencies have to be shad(e|ow)ed (and not exported) when
using jigsaw, it's not too much of a hassle to do a  ½-assed job. The only
thing that might take a bit more work is if you want to have extra support
for services.

I haven't checked if there's a non-beta release, but ASM 6 has had support
for the new module-info class format stuff for a year or so (Remy Forax
being on the  jpms EG).

For custom tooling there's no real win in using as input
(there was no real point in putting the metadata in .java and .class files
in the first place 🤦‍♂️).

JSON would be one good lazy mode; this could also be used to generate the
.java file.

Another possibility is to derive  module-info data from  bundles. The
metadata can be extracted fairly easily using bndlib. This would be more
complicated if there were imports, but since the only modules commons
projects can safely import are the non-default jdk ones (and possibly not
even all of those), it's essy to use a static map (which can be pretty much
generated from jmod/jdep).


[1] A module can only appear in the modpath once. A package can only come
from one module. If an application uses multiple third party dependencies,
which use different versions of a fourth party module,  "*Lasciate ogne
speranza, voi ch'intrate".*

On Oct 16, 2017 5:57 AM, "sebb" <> wrote:

> On 16 October 2017 at 10:34, Emmanuel Bourg <> wrote:
> > Le 14/10/2017 à 14:43, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> >
> >> I’d like to hear opinions on this change.
> >
> > I wonder if we could somehow write a compiler that
> > works with older version of Java. The syntax doesn't look terribly
> > complicated after all. It could be invoked from a plugin hooked to the
> > compile phase.
> Or skip the files if compiling with an older Java version?
> > Emmanuel Bourg
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message