Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBB0200CC3 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 16:21:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 8C39D16749F; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (unknown [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AC32D160BE7 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 16:21:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 51340 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2017 14:21:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 51328 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2017 14:21:19 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:21:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D78351A015B for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:21:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vqiaAalxeZsX for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-f171.google.com (mail-qt0-f171.google.com [209.85.216.171]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 901DF5F2F1 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f171.google.com with SMTP id b40so80549332qtb.2 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 07:21:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZNmyJwz+O3kC6utCxzEnvUHVJKqstT4/uF/kQUufOqE=; b=GFp6XRSSC+aRkDUHA6kn/nLHUbwEi59P2FO63Sm3qXOaJt7I9VZtAKhW9x8s5u4DKq 3+gT0Adnq8Pi19zpXH/Rp7dedMLAPAu+S98qbvyIIBOdrK2AQZF1pRfgXVVTjHgXHdkF +/kntvB7fjrjTxTAC09FmiDmvdw9JCvG1pA5SLabifFs5f26DOVy6jVPAqb/XsZaB03G r9M4mCWuPC7AY6l77FpCd6nSj3LFDzLiuhVDF0YCedrmHNIfuVOVS+YJnpxFHay0jryL oH8km9BnXrcp1U2RIlpy/tkMDSPNu5LXDm+bmldfOkLlP1BB1l38S2d70ufmLvqwiP4V TNvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ZNmyJwz+O3kC6utCxzEnvUHVJKqstT4/uF/kQUufOqE=; b=JHilSDdlYRt+eyUxvxyBCjl+1wJxc9rsjVMVLkN6qGQbd49qvHZGA+VLMBKliujBa4 NK9kHTI1aXNf9WEEkhLiYpxsY0YAI8/K+0C0gtOwkYrA85AgEFp7/EWZpkppFIHJnBlQ wGEjbTyhFtZixAXI1HAWw4E7z/OvikfVh9+lacGWz+wD2zPQFTiM0daHHD36YGhpxp5K UNTIEItzf7c14Otm6Nz9xipMzj7ExYAna3l8ZMo3mUqUKE8mYKlyTI0IskLk0Xr6rDKl Pyk4eBcRll4tWJcSPB4CoZ6bZdtadfqZWeBNCwzDCF6seOE8rHRl7IgHk9xTgm72mE6X MNkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113csCquqhIfmTnZDW4WH0lVS8TD+CH80vE+BPvVYTez+qZwkabw rxUAAgslEWFNnnMtbCMeeE3Kt80QUg== X-Received: by 10.237.34.52 with SMTP id n49mr16641839qtc.29.1500128475952; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 07:21:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.32.130 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 07:21:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Amey Jadiye Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 19:51:15 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [daemon] moving to git ? and bump java version. To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114178f4ed3b1c05545be087" archived-at: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:21:21 -0000 --001a114178f4ed3b1c05545be087 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Yes, that's mentioned in my previous mail, I was also curious to know from the C developers here in dev-list that how can we make *that* C code better? basically I'm looking findbug, checkstyle, jococo, junit *equivalent* for C code. Regards, Amey On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 7:44 PM, sebb wrote: > Also note that there is hardly any Java code; most of it is written in C. > > On 14 July 2017 at 00:43, Gary Gregory wrote: > > It seems OK to me to update to Java 6 for now and get this to compile > under > > java 9 for those folks who will try... > > > > Gary > > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Amey Jadiye > wrote: > > > >> Thanks for great insights Mark. > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017, 9:28 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> > >> > On 12 July 2017 16:33:01 CEST, Matt Sicker wrote: > >> > >Are there plans to require 1.7 for Tomcat anytime? Otherwise, it > might > >> > >be > >> > >necessary to make a new major version of daemon eventually for Java 8 > >> > >or 9. > >> > > >> > Tomcat major versions are aligned with Java EE versions which in turn > >> have > >> > a minimum Java version. > >> > > >> > Tomcat supports 3 current versions in parallel so we currently have: > >> > > >> > Tomcat 9 - Java EE 8 - Java 8 > >> > Tomcat 8 - Java EE 7 - Java 7 > >> > Tomcat 7 - Java EE 6 - Java 6 > >> > > >> > Tomcat 7 support will continue until at least Java EE 9 is released. > That > >> > is meant to be next year but there are no firm dates yet and > experience > >> > suggests the Java EE 9 release date will slip. > >> > > >> > On that basis I expect Tomcat to need a Daemon that supports Java 6 > for > >> at > >> > least 2 more years. > >> > > >> > Is there a user requirement driving an increase in the minimum Java > >> > version? If not, I suggest we stick with 6 for now. > >> > > >> > >> There is no user requirement , Commons daemon is still keeping minimum > >> dependency on java 1.5, we were thinking to move on minimum 1.6, nice to > >> hear there won't be any issue with tomcat since it's already on 1.6 > >> > >> For moving to much higher i.e. java 1.7 I'm sure daemon will take > another > >> 2-3 year for keeping stability across projects. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Amey > >> > >> Mark > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > >Anyways, 1.6 minimum makes sense to me mainly due to Java 9's > compiler > >> > >not > >> > >supporting Java 5 targets anymore. > >> > > > >> > >On 12 July 2017 at 09:19, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> On 11 July 2017 21:02:54 CEST, Amey Jadiye > >> > >wrote: > >> > >> >Hi Daemon Maintainers / All, > >> > >> > > >> > >> >Daemon seems to be still being maintained on svn, do we have any > >> > >plan > >> > >> >moving code base to git ? > >> > >> > >> > >> No preference on this. > >> > >> > >> > >> >As fact there is low activity in daemon no one thought of bumping > >> > >> >version > >> > >> >from 1.5 to 1.6 OR we are keeping it purposefully to 1.5 ? > >> > >> >shall we bump it minimum to 1.6 ? > >> > >> > >> > >> 1.6 is OK for Tomcat. Anything higher will cause problems. > >> > >> > >> > >> Mark > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org --001a114178f4ed3b1c05545be087--