Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <FE47D0DC-239D-48B0-99FA-A478A701CF41@apache.org>
References: <CACZkXPyG+GsZb+1r3AakKChNu-z0vQpY3xpk1nQDqRqLnnpnBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADE8KM689m4nupZOSd0OEg2E17xb33YSzvtv1+SSp9ACe+Hs+Q@mail.gmail.com> <FE47D0DC-239D-48B0-99FA-A478A701CF41@apache.org>
From: Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:19:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CACZkXPwX_6dae8sAWz2RtEZrZ4QXaWa0kNSVDoPL8UjJY0uN3w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [compress] HasCharset is a bad name
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045dcb58f4c7fc055423b1d8"
archived-at: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 19:19:45 -0000

--f403045dcb58f4c7fc055423b1d8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> > Am 11.07.2017 um 06:55 schrieb Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Since it's an interface, I could change it to IHasACharset?
> >
> > Or If you prefer I  could rename it to YouGiveLove?  (Lucky Millenials-
> you
> > aren't headsonged)
>
> I recommend to leave this kind of irony out of mailing list communication.
> This is probably your personal style of communicating, but it is hard to
> understand in remote communication with people from other cultural
> backgrounds. It makes communication more boring to remove this kind of
> sugar, but it helps to avoid misunderstandings.
>

I suppose Slack would work...

G

>
> Cheers,
> Benedikt
>
> >
> > The name follows a pattern for interfaces of this sort, which are
> basically
> > retrofit markers for the presence of property, (with associated getters).
> > I've seen it used in other projects, but it might be bleed through from
> > some  OWL / RDF patterns.
> >
> > I'm not in love with the pattern but it required the least thought :)
> >
> > (java 8 makes this sort of interface moot, as the accessor can be added
> as
> > a default method. It is even be a candidate for the proper use of
> Optional.
> > )
> >
> > On Jul 5, 2017 1:14 PM, "Gary Gregory" <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The new interface name HasCharset is pretty bad IMO.
> >
> > CharsetProvider is the obvious (to me) better name even though there
> > already is a class called java.nio.charset.spi.CharsetProvider.
> >
> > Alternatives could be CharsetContainer, CharsetAccessor, CharsetGetter, ?
> >
> > Gary
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

--f403045dcb58f4c7fc055423b1d8--