commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.6 based on RC3
Date Thu, 08 Jun 2017 17:09:16 GMT
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:57 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 8 June 2017 at 17:19, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> [A Note, not a vote :) ]
> >>
> >> 1. Clirr is generally considered obsolete, as it hadn't been worked on
> for
> >> about ten years.   japicmp is a good replacement, especially for report
> >> generation, and is used in other commons projects.
> >>
> >
> > IIRC, we've started using japicm here and there. Each component can
> decide.
> > But yes, Clirr looks pretty dead.
> >
> >
> >> 2. Are the "changes" to the values in CharEncoding really necessary[1]
> (The
> >> deprecation surely is). Technically this is a potentially breaking
> binary
> >> incompatible change, as constant strings and primitives are inlined at
> >> compile time. [2]
> >> In this particular case, the results of load-time evaluation of the new
> >> initialization expressions  are identical to the old constants, so it's
> >> behaviourally compatible; however, since this is the case, and since
> it's
> >> all deprecated anyway, why not leave the old values in-place?
> >>
> >
> > The changes are not "necessary" that for sure and we do get Clirr
> warnings:
> >
> > Value of field ISO_8859_1 is no longer a compile-time constant
> > Value of field US_ASCII is no longer a compile-time constant
> > Value of field UTF_16 is no longer a compile-time constant
> > Value of field UTF_16BE is no longer a compile-time constant
> > Value of field UTF_16LE is no longer a compile-time constant
> > Value of field UTF_8 is no longer a compile-time constant
> >
> > It's source compatible. What is the issue at runtime that could hurt
> users?
>
> As the OP wrote, constants are inlined by the compiler.
> So unless all code is recompiled, if it referenced the constant it may
> have a stale value.
> That is not binary compatible.
>

But in this case the actual values are the same are they not? So what is
the difference? Would this only be a problem if we changed the string
values? Which we can't since these are defined in the JRE. And the JRE is
unlikely to change those.

Gary


>
> >
> >> 3. JDK9 adds some extra parameters to the Deprecated annotation (most
> >> notably  forRemoval=true, which is used to indicate that the annotated
> item
> >> is really really deprecated.)   It's not needed in this case, but is
> worth
> >> thinking about  when jdk9 is eventually released (latest schedule
> change :
> >> from 7/27/2017 to 9/21/2017).
> >>
> >
> > I do not think we plan on making Java 9 a requirement for any current
> > project.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Simon
> >>
> >> [1]  https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/commit/7c19a1ff4c217
> >> f03c0be62baf1169d689f566825#diff-820a48456e11e85bf6cf5356c1aed4baR48
> >>
> >> [2] https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-
> >> 13.html#jls-13.4.9
> >>
> >> On Jun 8, 2017 4:48 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" <britter@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > we have fixed quite a few bugs and added some nice new features since
> >> > Commons Lang 3.5 was released, so I would like to release Commons Lang
> >> 3.6
> >> > based on RC3.
> >> > The following issues have been fixed since RC2:
> >> >
> >> > - Site build now works from source distribution
> >> > - IBM JDK test failures have been fixed
> >> > - Automatic-Module-Name MANIFEST entry has been added for Java 9
> >> > compatibility
> >> >
> >> > Commons Lang 3.6 R3 is available for review here:
> >> >  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang (svn revision
> >> 19928)
> >> >
> >> > The tag is here:
> >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-lang.git;a=tag;h=
> >> > e454e79463ffbbd9114db43019dd211debbcc105
> >> >
> >> > Commit ID the tag points at:
> >> >  360198dfb6a2d68f1702f616dfacee34ae0541bb
> >> >
> >> > Maven Artifacts:
> >> >  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapachecommons-1250
> >> >
> >> > These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes:
> >> >
> >> > /org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.6/commons-lang3-3.6-javadoc.jar
> >> > (SHA1: c8adadb6c0b56c73f2cc2b4c77a09bfe34ec3a66)
> >> > /org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.6/commons-lang3-3.6-
> sources.jar.asc
> >> > (SHA1: 46347c179ca9246d146d653bdc7363bda6f17d44)
> >> > /org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.6/commons-lang3-3.6.pom.asc
> >> > (SHA1: 1309d4f3dd41a01ff9dd1f3c1a6eee10dad1ef77)
> >> > /org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.6/commons-lang3-3.6.pom
> >> > (SHA1: 0fb4499188c94c63b3cba44f12481e193708c4a8)
> >> > /org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.6/commons-lang3-3.6.jar.asc
> >> > (SHA1: e67e7d44751f1e346c2fda496193cbe251cfe098)
> >> > /org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.6/commons-lang3-3.6-
> javadoc.jar.asc
> >> > (SHA1: 6b19fa12d319ced69c0f8a27001569514711f9dc)
> >> > /org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.6/commons-lang3-3.6-sources.jar
> >> > (SHA1: f89c1df082d6f67cb7c956715c56d7e7a0508d0a)
> >> > /org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.6/commons-lang3-3.6.jar
> >> > (SHA1: e58ba08b01d37a023746f0987dcd910036a63021)
> >> > /org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.6/commons-lang3-3.6-tests.jar.asc
> >> > (SHA1: af050e8c29a801a5d6783268c56230b814f56240)
> >> > /org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.6/commons-lang3-3.6-
> >> > test-sources.jar.asc
> >> > (SHA1: 71e4c11efb9e3b2eff402ba4648d21822fb8da4a)
> >> > /org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.6/commons-lang3-3.6-
> test-sources.jar
> >> > (SHA1: 04a0fc8293d4ed64a54dcc9ba5f996776a4657ea)
> >> > /org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.6/commons-lang3-3.6-tests.jar
> >> > (SHA1: 87993a16c14a251062e3fe860fa53b5ef5304a0f)
> >> >
> >> > I have tested this with JDK 7, JDK 8 and JDK 9 EA b172 using Maven
> 3.5.0.
> >> >
> >> > Details of changes since 3.5 are in the release notes:
> >> >    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/RELEASE-
> NOTES.txt
> >> >    http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/lang/LANG_3_6_
> >> > RC3/changes-report.html
> >> >
> >> > Site:
> >> >      http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/lang/LANG_3_6_RC3
> >> >  (note some *relative* links are broken and the 3.6 directories are
> >> >  not yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)
> >> >
> >> > Clirr Report (compared to 3.5):
> >> >    http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/lang/LANG_3_6_
> >> > RC3/clirr-report.html
> >> >
> >> > RAT Report:
> >> >        http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/lang/LANG_3_6_
> >> > RC3/rat-report.html
> >> >
> >> > KEYS:
> >> >  https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> >> >
> >> > Please review the release candidate and vote.
> >> > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now,
> >> > i.e. sometime after 11:00 CEST (UTC+2) 11-June 2017
> >> >
> >> >  [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> >> >  [ ] +0 OK, but...
> >> >  [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> >> >  [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> > Benedikt
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message