commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
Subject Re: [Numbers] Angle class?
Date Thu, 11 May 2017 20:39:16 GMT
On Fri, 12 May 2017 01:43:24 +0530, Amey Jadiye wrote:
> Agreed with Raymond +1
>
> If we want to make things modular I would prefer core should have 
> very core
> part of numbers in CN which were in Commons Math and already 
> separated in
> from CM to CN, as Angle is the part of geometry  the package for it 
> should
> be like.
>
> package some.pkg.geometry.core;
>
> IMHO PlaneAngle should be part of geometry.

It is at the core of "geometry", but some basic functionalities can
be seen as "number-like", and be useful without having to depend on
a full-fledged geometry library.

Regards,
Gilles

>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Raymond DeCampo <ray@decampo.org> 
> wrote:
>
>> My first thought is that adding geometry to commons-numbers is too 
>> much
>> "scope creep" for lack of a better term.  There's a lot of code 
>> under the
>> org.apache.commons.math4.geometry package in CM.
>>
>> I guess I am wondering where we want to draw the line.  Obviously we 
>> do not
>> want all of CM in numbers or we will be back where we started when 
>> we began
>> splitting it up.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Gilles 
>> <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > Please have a look at
>> >   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-37
>> >
>> > Comments, suggestions, objections?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Gilles
>> >
>> >


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message