Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <57be75dd0be738244050fda1f88d4db5@scarlet.be>
References: <fe261fd971bbe697d9651027c052cb9f@scarlet.be> <CAJcp7juhtk+ffxckABnPB1qhQjRRrDiikv7zn=3qgyyT0TwQew@mail.gmail.com>
 <00d090fb25dda572d701b3bbd605af68@scarlet.be> <CAOGo0VZJZYv98vrPM+h_=3oSuep6Q8Y+frOL6=H4+t-4ctkQ2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <3009f27dfd1d9315224c29d41cddd3b2@scarlet.be> <57be75dd0be738244050fda1f88d4db5@scarlet.be>
From: Raymond DeCampo <ray@decampo.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:20:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGTHBS5z9bZH00BK04t8JrvJk2b_Pwe6XtD_=8AWoaxUUyxrAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename "Complex" to "Numbers"
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11490a807d336605464a2b8a
archived-at: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:21:03 -0000

--001a11490a807d336605464a2b8a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out with the transition.

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Gilles <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:

> The following people
>  Eric Barnhill
>  Rob Tompkins
>  J=C3=B6rg Schaible
>  Emmanuel Bourg
> voted +1
>
> Vote passes.
>
> Gilles
>
>
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 19:02:04 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>
>> See discussion thread, copied below.
>>
>> [ ] Yes
>> [ ] Yes but I prefer this name: ...
>> [ ] No, because ...
>>
>> I'll assume that this is a lazy consensus vote, to be closed in 72 hours
>> from now (i.e. on January 12, at 18:00:00 UTC).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gilles
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 15:57:51 +0000, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 January 2017 at 11:46, Gilles <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote=
:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:08:18 +0100, Eric Barnhill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It is overall a fine plan by me. A precision class makes more sense
>>>>> than
>>>>> duplicating equals methods.
>>>>>
>>>>> From a practical standpoint I think it would be better to see
>>>>> Quaternion
>>>>> in
>>>>> its own subpackage than with Complex. Simply because I don't use them
>>>>> and
>>>>> packages are better maintained by those who use them.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is hard to see how the transforms fit in. If anything they belong
>>>>> with
>>>>> the new sigproc libraries.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fine.
>>>>
>>>> Is there any objection on the name "Commons Numbers"?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Since the namespace belongs to the whole of Commons, this question
>>> should be posed to all of Commons, i.e. using the [ALL] prefix.
>>>
>>> Are there better matches for the intended scope? [Or do we want that
>>>> the scope grows to also contain the "o.a.c.math4.prime" package" and
>>>> possibly more of number-theoretic functionality (as was proposed some
>>>> time ago to be added to Commons Math)?]
>>>>
>>>> Shall I wait a couple of days before filing the request with INFRA?
>>>> [I.e. to change the "git" repository, JIRA project and github mirror.]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gilles
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Eric
>>>>> On 8 Jan 2017 10:17, "Gilles" <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about renaming the component to "Commons Numbers" (or another na=
me
>>>>>> if preferred) that would contain the following modules:
>>>>>>  * commons-numbers-core (with classes such as "Precision").
>>>>>>  * commons-numbers-complex
>>>>>>  * commons-numbers-quaternion
>>>>>>  * commons-numbers-fraction
>>>>>>  * commons-numbers-continued-fraction
>>>>>>  * commons-numbers-fft (Fast Fourier Transform)
>>>>>>  * commons-numbers-fct (Fast Cosine Transform)
>>>>>>  * ...
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

--001a11490a807d336605464a2b8a--