commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Barnhill <ericbarnh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Rename "Complex" to "Numbers" (Was: [complex] Make multi-module and rename component?)
Date Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:39:13 GMT
+1

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Brent Worden <brent.worden@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Are the originally mentioned transforms in or out of scope of
> commons-numbers?
>
> Brent
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Gilles <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>
> wrote:
>
> > See discussion thread, copied below.
> >
> > [ ] Yes
> > [ ] Yes but I prefer this name: ...
> > [ ] No, because ...
> >
> > I'll assume that this is a lazy consensus vote, to be closed in 72 hours
> > from now (i.e. on January 12, at 18:00:00 UTC).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gilles
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 15:57:51 +0000, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 9 January 2017 at 11:46, Gilles <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:08:18 +0100, Eric Barnhill wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> It is overall a fine plan by me. A precision class makes more sense
> than
> >>>> duplicating equals methods.
> >>>>
> >>>> From a practical standpoint I think it would be better to see
> Quaternion
> >>>> in
> >>>> its own subpackage than with Complex. Simply because I don't use them
> >>>> and
> >>>> packages are better maintained by those who use them.
> >>>>
> >>>> It is hard to see how the transforms fit in. If anything they belong
> >>>> with
> >>>> the new sigproc libraries.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Fine.
> >>>
> >>> Is there any objection on the name "Commons Numbers"?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Since the namespace belongs to the whole of Commons, this question
> >> should be posed to all of Commons, i.e. using the [ALL] prefix.
> >>
> >> Are there better matches for the intended scope? [Or do we want that
> >>> the scope grows to also contain the "o.a.c.math4.prime" package" and
> >>> possibly more of number-theoretic functionality (as was proposed some
> >>> time ago to be added to Commons Math)?]
> >>>
> >>> Shall I wait a couple of days before filing the request with INFRA?
> >>> [I.e. to change the "git" repository, JIRA project and github mirror.]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Gilles
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Eric
> >>>> On 8 Jan 2017 10:17, "Gilles" <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How about renaming the component to "Commons Numbers" (or another
> name
> >>>>> if preferred) that would contain the following modules:
> >>>>>  * commons-numbers-core (with classes such as "Precision").
> >>>>>  * commons-numbers-complex
> >>>>>  * commons-numbers-quaternion
> >>>>>  * commons-numbers-fraction
> >>>>>  * commons-numbers-continued-fraction
> >>>>>  * commons-numbers-fft (Fast Fourier Transform)
> >>>>>  * commons-numbers-fct (Fast Cosine Transform)
> >>>>>  * ...
> >>>>> ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gilles
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message