commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Best Home for Checksum Implementations?
Date Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:05:16 GMT

> Am 24.01.2017 um 11:35 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>:
> 
> Le 24/01/2017 à 10:08, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> 
>> I was wondering whether these implementations would belong in one of the
>> other components (as well as - rather than instead of - compress) but
>> I'm not sure where it would fit.
> 
> What about a dedicated component for checksum implementations? It could
> also take over the digest package of [codec] which looks a bit misplaced
> (codec is more about bijective coding/decoding than one-way hashing).
> 
> As for the name, either:
> - commons-checksum
> - commons-hashing
> - commons-digest (but could be confused with digester)

I’m all for small and focused components.

Benedikt

> 
> Emmanuel Bourg
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message