commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE][RC6] Release Commons RNG 1.0 (reminder)
Date Sun, 11 Dec 2016 06:11:30 GMT
On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:22:30 +0100, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons RNG 1.0 (from RC6).
>
>
> Tag name:
>   RNG_1_0_RC6 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v')
>
> Tag URL:
>
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-rng.git;a=commit;h=4581a4520315657a4219b37c81f5db80e4a4e43c
>
> Commit ID the tag points at:
>   4581a4520315657a4219b37c81f5db80e4a4e43c
>
> Site:
>   http://home.apache.org/~erans/commons-rng-1.0-RC6-site
>
> Distribution files (committed at revision 17284):
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/rng/
>
> Distribution files hashes (SHA1):
>   c5e70a523160ed848194eeba0efa2b14d23c7a61 
> commons-rng-1.0-bin.tar.gz.sha1
>   66d7701afc90aafa4c4b6e033b8df6cd84365161 
> commons-rng-1.0-bin.zip.sha1
>   ef56543c8882a0e4771de83ecf8b3be190f122cf 
> commons-rng-1.0-src.tar.gz.sha1
>   3dc56b0793d8bbd703a4efa68547eb58f6fb5b35 
> commons-rng-1.0-src.zip.sha1
>
> KEYS file to check signatures:
>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
> Maven artifacts:
>   
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1229/
>
> Please select one of the following options[1]:
>  [ ] +1 Release it.
>  [ ] +0 Go ahead; I don't care.
>  [ ] -0 There are a few minor glitches: ...
>  [ ] -1 No, do not release it because ...
>
> This vote will be open at least 72 hours, i.e. until 
> 2016-12-10T00:00:00Z
> (this is UTC time).
> ----------

Ping?

Unless I'm mistaken, after 100 hours have elapsed, there are only
2 votes for RC6.
The only change wrt RC5 is that the (single) problem, reported by
Oliver, has been fixed.

Please share your opinion about releasing[1] this new component,
especially since RC6 has gone a long way to satisfy requests[2]
that were not part of my initial plan.[3]


Thanks,
Gilles

[1] RC1, 2 and 5 each had more than the three required votes...
     [For RC3 and 4, I stopped the RM process before getting to
     the vote.]
[2] Cf. long discussion(s) threads about modularization, utilities
     (sampling and shuffling), versioning.
[3] In a RERO view, the stated scope should have been sufficient
     to release the actual code at least 3 months ago (even much
     earlier, given that the development occurred under public
     scrutiny for more than a year now).

>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
> [1] http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message