commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
Subject Re: [ALL] Why is the component's web site part of the release vote?
Date Thu, 08 Dec 2016 16:21:20 GMT
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:33:43 +0100, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Gilles <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org> 
> wrote:
>
>> I've just noticed a small problem in the (staged) web site
>> submitted for the release of Commons RNG v1.0:
>>   
>> http://home.apache.org/~erans/commons-rng-1.0-RC6-site/rat-report.html
>>
>> Since this must be fixed in the regenerated site will
>> not reflect the released version number, why do we
>> actually have to vote on the site?
>
> In my opinion: We do not vote on the site. Which is why deficiencies
> in the proposed site aren't blocking a release.
>
> That being said:
>
> a) The proposed site may be helpful for the release vote, if for no
> other reasons than the
>      RAT report.

The problem, in this particular case is that the RAT output published
in the RC version of the site reports violations on files not part of
the release.

Gilles

>
> b) The proposal leads to people verifying the site, which they 
> usually
> wouldn't do.
>
>
> Jochen
>
>
> 
> http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message