Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A355200BD1 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:58:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 88C42160B0D; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AB26D160B00 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:58:55 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 48578 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2016 17:58:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 48551 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2016 17:58:54 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:58:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D4D83D6629 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:58:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.898 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.898 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_WP_DIRINDEX=2.999] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sVNT9xxAK9Og for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com (mail-oi0-f48.google.com [209.85.218.48]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1469C5FC81 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id v84so159752459oie.3 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:58:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zoHAs9jQtvTx5cVkPLBHCZalfhKla2sN4oHQ5HLMzdc=; b=hlyx9oc4cFG7VCupDVypi0n63EZIJ+Qo1BcCB5Ur6rvod8tnKPs2z+F9CoGY2yOO9Z J6A5IaoH5vBj+xZQt89xHaD05yvVRxQ9cubQx+MeaZGq53onw1h9AvJ/VtCs1CTIqZKt QyymOuefIgV+Yp2XrYT2nH8n85MU0HJsGEtbdhwA/JuehcU1R0rcWXGxhjqjqQ1frtA9 cOk2a0b+XkeqhPRjp2qZdWDz2kD1XHhXRvh9YCVJADzSP6RC+BsnM7AdDMBmKa/rXT0t 6rRAwa6AMpu4/f4wayZNE01zTrmImw4FYJ6nHv/onYNi5+FyvsgnbQn7m48+abltN5Ch JD0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=zoHAs9jQtvTx5cVkPLBHCZalfhKla2sN4oHQ5HLMzdc=; b=fQbwSKeIYVOVeXKwjI5Hovk83Yzki6CId9DeCoSV6fLLKfnjf10uryT6ADZ9YDcjmr E3qbEM23otd0HeEV22M4cPFFtUh/1gHsy6l7kkiirXiJk7ou8gzH/M7ryhp9Bs7ujOo0 LFfWX6VqtMWSs4K2j2zDLU8X7CwEHu1qiqMAe8xGaLTy+a5Lp5roi1SinL96ouGS4Mr2 wRzEwD2brSjILna0Ahp52utE+0QdhaYWbKG6YLBnRDjNzc/3sj7S/KljPzKQz6f4uQSG 9VyZfLiCBUcWpEYEvsU9i+nKj1FaEo3s5LVjgHkmauc5gT4FxC3U8jLphJOuMuxxtwEi oSGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01nv3EzcSF7j264NXrlR8Hkj5E2y6mXwdhJkevHs6u9BWdHAWpJ7xRftdXKVOnU0LlEkPGUWoXTx+Dw6Q== X-Received: by 10.157.27.208 with SMTP id v16mr14259087otv.207.1480355929333; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:58:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.35.40 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:58:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Gary Gregory Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:58:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lang] Thread safety annotations To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141481a4f245b054260394e archived-at: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:58:56 -0000 --001a1141481a4f245b054260394e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 4:06 PM, sebb wrote: > > > The code would not run without the JCIP jar. > > Are there licensing issues regarding that jar? > Hm, according to https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html, the license "Creative Commons Attribution (CC-A) 2.5" is discussed in the section "HOW SHOULD "WEAK COPYLEFT" LICENSES BE HANDLED?" It looks like we might have an issue but this is not clear to me as IANAL. I you look at the license summary https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ it sure seems OK, but our resolved.html has this license on a list of licenses to watch out for. So to be on the safe side, how do we best re-implement these? The annotation names we can keep as is but I would imagine that we'd want to re-write the Javadoc from scratch. Thoughts? Gary > Jochen > > > -- > The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" > > http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ > evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition JUnit in Action, Second Edition Spring Batch in Action Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --001a1141481a4f245b054260394e--