Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A6A200BB5 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:00:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id C7564160AFC; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 19E7B160AE8 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:00:42 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 62678 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2016 18:00:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 62662 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2016 18:00:41 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 18:00:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 66F961A94D9 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:00:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.679 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id szIeFGfLNm1p for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com (mail-it0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 42B795F30C for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id e187so56343731itc.0 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:00:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zoUSHoN4x36y5sdofWUd5Y8ZamnvMMYNglb41WW3HFg=; b=mMEDyVwEjvtYOqnR9fgpXXA/+cSyKgpIqgLWUjVBybUYCEC9Jl7fn3gckQ/BBaSVrr jQtd4qvyl0xvhlrZzGx6wqA/fkYXqRr6+CGmm9jvLV5SR+F1HdetuULzvn6xa07rnBjE D93NHZ0v85zUnAyNdSGsKbUbS4BKExeddeiAzg4pf9V8TjNTPB3AXWKlDK//2N5KVfDD M9ua3yMua89fNsry7lQAMoVy7JuIY71ogDLXnsSUMkPipwhmq87pOWkxm04DOJegk7pM 2yGzp6Y1cbxHjV9iKm61/SYt+KvjPNCJ+e0/2h3wVr36EwWOrDNc/nllCij1L9N79JOb MH6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=zoUSHoN4x36y5sdofWUd5Y8ZamnvMMYNglb41WW3HFg=; b=Y39JDOHf+nIJpkic+2XUji8V7xgSAhnUOEXM/yr1rMtwu3HGOjBCltZ2w9zL+m4kO6 pw68mq2kTxe15s2LarBXgalrUl9+q2vGhJPnaruJ9cKBiNLeUFhWXEAceaIQWNIIrKNk OSd/0Vp3iAb0KZNmvn3ZJ0U5/6ogqW4DJU2N4QzMgCjMXHdqXgzingQgx2yrH46KCxtm yd6quJRpdp7/LqERn5e8y81mnXXiJeGhJKlhpACvtcPt9hUutrs6MCqaUeC1dzlwnomi lYgNqF3+SJ+e2CiDTAqJqTDjf+TlEvRaRmUuS4ETlAgK3teCJVjJD7ikK1/8YU/xee+w CByw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcbKX+a7VvrVhi4AVQDewpFmseke4fFGHNQmfuhFCQVlMJ8sZdXjJxP1dX25JMFLkiQ5okLl453Hmc4Cg== X-Received: by 10.202.195.18 with SMTP id t18mr2354045oif.110.1478455238545; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:00:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.44.139 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 10:00:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.157.44.139 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 10:00:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Gary Gregory Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 10:00:38 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FindBugs project announced as 'dead', blaims code rot and lack of maintainers To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134fbce4f58880540a5af13 archived-at: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 18:00:44 -0000 --001a1134fbce4f58880540a5af13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The whole post is interesting. Sounds like a fork is inevitable. So much work though... Gary On Nov 6, 2016 9:32 AM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" wrote: > See > https://mailman.cs.umd.edu/pipermail/findbugs-discuss/ > 2016-November/004321.html > > In particular the author is not happy about the BCEL integration: > > > The other major reasons for the FindBugs current bad state: > > > > 1) The code is very complex, has "organically grown" over a decade, is > > not documented and has poor public interfaces. Most of the code consists > > of the very low level bytecode related stuff, tightly coupled with the > > ancient BCEL library, which doesn't scale and is not multi-thread safe. > > No one enjoys maintaining this code, at least not me. I see no future > > for FindBugs with the BCEL approach, and see no way to get rid of it > > without investing lot of effort, and without breaking every detector and > > possibly many 3rd party tools. This is the biggest issue we have with > > FindBugs today, and most likely the root cause for all the evil. This > > code can't be fixed, it must be rewritten. > > ..but the main problem seems to be lack of maintaners. > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --001a1134fbce4f58880540a5af13--