commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <>
Subject Re: [complex][math-util] dependencies
Date Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:19:24 GMT
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Eric Barnhill <>

> I thought it would be good to raise a structural question here rather than
> in the commons-complex JIRA.
> The Complex library has multiple dependencies on three packages:
> -- commons-math base classes (e.g. Field et al.)
> -- commons-math exceptions
> -- commons-math util (numerous classes)
> Otherwise it is self-contained. (Some tests within the  QuaternionTest
> class use a large chain of dependencies from the geometry package, so I
> think it is best to simply remove the geometry-dependent tests until
> someone arrives to maintain that library.)
> This suggests to me that, if we were to continue with some kind of
> math-utils base class,

Don't you mean a... what? package? Maven module?


> it should consist of these three current packages:
> the base classes, util and exception. It might in fact make sense to spin
> out this base library first (which I am happy to oversee) then return to
> finishing out the independent complex library with only commons-math-util
> as dependency. Would this also be compatible with the current trajectory of
> RNG?
> Eric

E-Mail: |
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition

JUnit in Action, Second Edition

Spring Batch in Action

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message