Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133F9200BAC for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:01:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 11C2C160AEE; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 57FC8160AE1 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:01:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 27768 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2016 19:01:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 27757 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2016 19:01:11 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:01:11 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 017E61A0143 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id d128so100649500wmf.1 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:01:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdOhOezKXTmPf7dyO22FmkU3BrsPN2U0P2bRXse47VEOw6SqNCMtxHDM6jMHg/9ZL+YehWoQAkL2CGuMQ== X-Received: by 10.28.142.82 with SMTP id q79mr3946842wmd.20.1477508468306; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:01:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Benedikt Ritter Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:00:57 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [complex] commons-complex module To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114426fc68014a053fc93f6b archived-at: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:01:18 -0000 --001a114426fc68014a053fc93f6b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable dbrosIus schrieb am Di., 25. Okt. 2016 um 18:26 Uhr: > I think we should let the people doing the work, decide. > I agree with David. Apache is a Do-ocracy. Nevertheless I think we should focus on finishing the first release of RNG instead of starting of the next component. we already have some proper components who have never seen a release (imaging, functor, OGNL 4.0) and I don't want the new math components to have the same fate. Benedikt > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Emmanuel Bourg > Date: 10/25/16 11:51 AM (GMT-05:00) > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [complex] commons-complex module > > Le 25/10/2016 =C3=A0 17:46, Jochen Wiedmann a =C3=A9crit : > > Honestly, I really wonder why all this stuff has to fork yet another > > commons component. IMO, CM could just have been changed to emit > > multiple jar files with no need for other components. No need for > > discussions, no need for new repositories in Git, no need for new > > stuff in Jira. Or, to put it different: Less to maintain. > > +1 > > This should have been a module of commons-math, there was no consensus > for a new component. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --001a114426fc68014a053fc93f6b--