commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [complex] commons-complex module
Date Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:00:57 GMT
dbrosIus <dbrosIus@baybroadband.net> schrieb am Di., 25. Okt. 2016 um
18:26 Uhr:

> I think we should let the people doing the work,  decide.
>

I agree with David. Apache is a Do-ocracy.

Nevertheless I think we should focus on finishing the first release of RNG
instead of starting of the next component. we already have some proper
components who have never seen a release (imaging, functor, OGNL 4.0) and I
don't want the new math components to have the same fate.

Benedikt


>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
> Date: 10/25/16  11:51 AM  (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [complex] commons-complex module
>
> Le 25/10/2016 à 17:46, Jochen Wiedmann a écrit :
> > Honestly, I really wonder why all this stuff has to fork yet another
> > commons component. IMO, CM could just have been changed to emit
> > multiple jar files with no need for other components. No need for
> > discussions, no need for new repositories in Git, no need for new
> > stuff in Jira. Or, to put it different: Less to maintain.
>
> +1
>
> This should have been a module of commons-math, there was no consensus
> for a new component.
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message