Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BEC200B51 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 21:38:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E43BE160A6C; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3985A160A66 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 21:38:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 53617 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2016 19:38:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 53605 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2016 19:38:11 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:38:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 82F32180AFA for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:38:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NjN843SiHFE2 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.10]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1FFCB5F295 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([88.65.112.19]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LqlQA-1aq2bC29EQ-00ePCe for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 21:38:00 +0200 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC2 To: Commons Developers List References: From: Oliver Heger Message-ID: <21e3b5cc-fa93-ea7d-c333-8945a2787aed@oliver-heger.de> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 21:38:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:9mnb4MQAEH8c/X6ra2tLgkXJQdKghbtW0nqd56OcF5BvtLOZY0r ks+QUFeHRl/luOpkCRJrbhxzkAOMUmZUeeKiIvIwp+dbPLsEKQR2KzsqNVVkOi0BVuHmvRF i4n3+ss3FTHLeNbozLhmDkmS/xAznuB93hZ7R+1VR20520mXSH0/td6NS0ekR7+QJl/8j5L oUYEdm1kUQzbLu3GMVC3A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:QqNkUpU6v5o=:zEHTvnChkSWPNF89rTXYIA xrJ85/V5193TLrljmUe6lhRkpl5AIzfcjU5ziexS5n7x/OB1LHZy/se5Fmg0cH/ZpiwqWqP7+ R6LPF+JA3O95wab13mm4SsnV18tloTSjjbe1wx2uoVgjCbsmDFPOPtyy8NLHkqF62AzR8MHLN V/Us2+IFNmWmrxq2zX/vooYOyaoIGvKt/hQjxOAJH9W5PB49xmVb/trCtXMNTrArcNgffrEhM vaUFoN6q95ffvqLjVFKSzMG3qQ6IVFZd+lg5fiSQLbDbdLEkBPSbphluo0ekf75mbyWcZJQy0 1aDhQXdmMl9VPVUGikJWiCEx7ukJzhv5t1MxxYGZ8gZwKSGE2rcYwGE2630UZkpOU7v2Q4dmv Ed0WElJnVwnDKQwpq+82+UZxE3SorEJ4SHmPE0DypEaJdO300+qyCakaFe8obpk6CkdR1BjuW 8M7Bd16QI+MP4FOMDJrEuZChTf1AP4c+iwqMi6tvFldZGrwAaJvBFm9MF+oc3vT33AJ64xWLs w01LAToFwWL+cO8pNmD8fxysqDkl+cSi6l3XoQn/fAlPSQ9JBkcF3RYIbRQlewIvDNJpE/hlE WdIG9oJ3S33gCCbgoxsKUGTv5tmjjVcZ6pqBC7/G1bArXqvqqa3EZNY2LAni1oIgNoDFxFJRz VlFqdl+HJ9ZDHcz0uoeNAkjDs0q1glE4n6v1/w6DgTnphrB/ntCUYqC12vCXWHJylKzx1LkKg QSkeSb1ZQusUxSPF archived-at: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:38:13 -0000 Am 01.08.2016 um 11:04 schrieb Dennis Kieselhorst: > Hi Benedikt! > >> The build log is here [1]. It looks like some generated classes are checked >> by checkstyle which causes the build to fail. The build works with Java 7 >> and Java 8. So my vote again is -1 because I think mvn clean install should >> work with the minimum required JDK out of the box. Sorry. >> > That's strange, I don't see why it should behave differently. Anyway > I've added an exclude for it (this was already done for rat and clirr). > This time I installed the same versions you used to build it, so next > time it should be successful. Sorry for being lazy last time... Many thanks, Dennis. I see the checkstyle plugin has a failOnViolation flag which is *true* per default. Should we set it to *false* (this would be my preference). I will leave the vote open for now. To make it clear: There is no problem with the artifacts, they are fully compatible with Java 1.6. There is only an issue when building with 1.6 which should not affect many users. However, I am skeptical whether this vote will pass. Oliver > > Regards > Dennis > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org