commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
Subject [rng] JDK version (Was: ... commit ...)
Date Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:50:54 GMT
Hi.

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:33:30 +0000, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> <erans@apache.org> schrieb am Do., 18. Aug. 2016 um 16:32 Uhr:
>
>> Repository: commons-rng
>> Updated Branches:
>>   refs/heads/master cccd43c05 -> 294fa53a2
>>
>>
>> Fix dependency info.
>>
>>
>> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/repo
>> Commit: 
>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/commit/55e935ef
>> Tree: 
>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/tree/55e935ef
>> Diff: 
>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/diff/55e935ef
>>
>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>> Commit: 55e935ef14fdc66b9872feeb96629917adaaf6a0
>> Parents: cccd43c
>> Author: Gilles <erans@apache.org>
>> Authored: Thu Aug 18 18:01:52 2016 +0200
>> Committer: Gilles <erans@apache.org>
>> Committed: Thu Aug 18 18:01:52 2016 +0200
>>
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  pom.xml | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> 
>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/blob/55e935ef/pom.xml
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
>> index 807babc..2843c90 100644
>> --- a/pom.xml
>> +++ b/pom.xml
>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>>
>>  
>> <commons.osgi.private>org.apache.commons.rng.internal</commons.osgi.private>
>>      <!-- do not use snapshot suffix here -->
>>      <commons.release.version>1.0</commons.release.version>
>> -    <commons.release.desc>(requires Java 
>> 1.5+)</commons.release.desc>
>> +    <commons.release.desc>(requires Java 1.6+)
>
>
> Whould be okay for me to go with 1.7 right away.

There was a discussion about that (cf. archive).
Short summary: we can stick with 1.6 for the time being (only a few
lines of code would benefit from 1.7).

Regards,
Gilles

P.S. A thing we did not consider is whether a JAR compiled for 1.7 
would provide
      a performance enhancement.
      If that's the case, users of later Java versions should recompile 
rather
      than use the JAR provided by Apache.  Perhaps this is more 
important than
      loosing JDK 6 potential users.
      Developers who still have JDK 6 and 7 installed are welcome to run 
the
      benchmarks (JMH-ready in "src/test").


>> </commons.release.desc>
>>      <!-- <commons.rc.version>RC1</commons.rc.version> -->
>>      <commons.binary.suffix>-bin</commons.binary.suffix>
>>
>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message