Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A7E200B47 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 01:27:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id C2180160A5F; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 23:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 156F3160A5D for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 01:27:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 24571 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2016 23:27:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 24559 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2016 23:27:04 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 23:27:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 477D81A010D for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 23:27:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.72 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5G_FHBpYVTAH for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 23:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3AB2A5F393 for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 23:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id f126so64475482wma.1 for ; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 16:27:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tJYL/4l9VCcTP2Wc1UhNIOZOdUdcUCunJG20WqtAD5o=; b=J2xRQ1622xRxbs+YB1BkRyQQvVkRlzTdYwp6wfk9tS0LtPY0ERhkmvHYueQp4OVYRC oWffL0O9vmVo9ABwwv5jNBVyrwUYAX0Q2eSEl73qTRqQaDiCCYyi9f68vc0XAhvSEpfK 7BrJv0H3kr0V+Ti9hUKPf9Pf1+12ABFJMbPb9jkWADM0tSlFX1CE/FGwAVp7bcZbfeFt ehxIWhVnzsdWocIStaAbwLcVwMsAdO91pBDn0qXKurgMywCXz/HVhM7bXHktXYtUSkMp D7tIX4IltoW8RhgPVf7leCvj2WxoeiEgwO1ZDMALp8lPnR5G1KSA3yT+wGP6jIzCM+FA UwQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tJYL/4l9VCcTP2Wc1UhNIOZOdUdcUCunJG20WqtAD5o=; b=kdsWoF3wPNQMDt4tsVI8LNZm9ZpZClfPuIOefPHibT3kvXX/rF1nrRRnSMgdByHkZX PUesYQlfqUQpQp3en/Ms0Hc6jfyFV56ked4xW2MysEkQPysaY6ujRn7fvdm4sTktXkpA FrlJ71v/c4aeKKciSkwN489R9l4Fn+6qoqsWbuWvK3fR1VNIh5kZ/a2+hCB3L/6q/dli 5Igje04Su4hDL5PM1hO24n6ODHrbVK2Zy8MDsZrIrtVGb6zWi3F9OJ1yeVTKCxu1lnDY p9ZR3oC+nDN3ZW20Q2eJmeCuqPU/wU+urETNAFNw2lZpofgJmGGtSvZtb1P7F0LwY7vB pB2g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL2TxE8WTFfpjoo7GBto9yY/yyFexT1g/ibq5hX69Ulo6dRR42HCNEIEkaqXCFlzw== X-Received: by 10.28.145.17 with SMTP id t17mr4527795wmd.14.1467502016386; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 16:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e35:2f71:31d0:ac0c:4d9a:2ee:87a9? ([2a01:e35:2f71:31d0:ac0c:4d9a:2ee:87a9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v70sm91527wmf.18.2016.07.02.16.26.55 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Jul 2016 16:26:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Emmanuel Bourg Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What to do about [OGNL]? To: Commons Developers List References: From: Emmanuel Bourg Message-ID: <874d3c5c-079d-e839-6cfd-d6de063823f9@apache.org> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 01:26:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit archived-at: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 23:27:06 -0000 Le 2/07/2016 à 21:15, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > currently nobody seems to be pushing [ognl]. However the original project > on GitHub seems to be pretty active [1] - the last release was published > just three days ago. This gives me the impression that the project never > really joined Apache Commons. Do we need to act? The README file on GitHub states: "The code base sometime ago was migrated to the Apache commons ognl and this source code is used just to maintenance 3.x branch. The new version from Apache will start from 4.x" We could suggest Lukasz to bring the 3.x maintenance at Apache Commons. I suspect moving OGNL to Git would be a prerequisite. Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org