commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons Fileupload to Git
Date Fri, 15 Jul 2016 07:09:51 GMT
+1, shading of a released jar should be preferred.

But there are many solutions for deliberately using a pre-release. maven
scm plugin for instance, or using the GitHub mirror's svn view.

(Also +1 for move to git)

On 12 Jul 2016 8:01 a.m., "Jochen Wiedmann" <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi, Konstantin,
>
> I can think of no reason, why it should be desirable to maintain a
> fork, rather than simply using the release jar. I strongly suggest,
> that Tomcat stops doing so, for examply by shading the jar, if the
> package names might be the problem.
>
> If required, I am quite ready to help with the necessary changes.
>
> Either way, I am strongly opposed to another project blocking
> decisions, which are clearly internal to Commons. That applies in all
> cases, you mentioned.
>
> Sorry,
>
> Jochen
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
> <knst.kolinko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am -1 because this code is copied into Apache Tomcat, I think such
> > migration will impede maintenance of the fork.
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/fileupload/
> >
> > See svn:mergeinfo at the bottom of the page.
> >
> > I am not on Commons PMC though,
> >
> > The same for BCEL, Codec, DBCP, Pool
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/bcel/
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/codec/
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/dbcp/dbcp2/
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/dbcp/pool2/
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Konstantin Kolinko
> >
> > 2016-07-10 13:45 GMT+03:00 Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'd like to call a VOTE by LAZY
> >> consensus for migrating the Apache Commons Fileupload component to git.
> Please
> >> object to this vote if you see a problem with this. Otherwise this vote
> >> will be considered as passed after 72 hours from now (10th June 2016,
> 09:00
> >> CET)
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >>
> >> Jochen
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
> >>
> >>
> http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
>
>
> http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message