commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7
Date Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:25:41 GMT
+1, I tested on Debian with OpenJDK 8. I got the same test failure
reported by Oliver on Windows 7.

Emmanuel Bourg


Le 2/07/2016 à 20:52, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7. Changes compared
> to RC6 are:
> 
> - restored binary compatibility to a greater degree
> - fixed issue BCEL-262
> 
> BCEL 6.0 RC7 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/ (svn revision 14251)
> 
> The tag is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC7/ (svn
> revision 1751084)
> 
> Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1181/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/
> 
> These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes
> 
> bcel-6.0-javadoc.jar
>   (SHA1: f1e1534867a901b9ba4884e5805317635c324589)
> bcel-6.0-sources.jar
>   (SHA1: 9ba3b50aa95289d01ec119b60be68eb4c608ba1d)
> bcel-6.0-test-sources.jar
>   (SHA1: 484b29d3a73fbe0c103d85965c4fd22e6253f545)
> bcel-6.0-tests.jar
>   (SHA1: f8b5857f3245e10548ef29cf7006c045b913a199)
> bcel-6.0.jar
>   (SHA1: fe1ecaf2ba3b1f9f18cdde4f13943e3ccc1d5e69)
> bcel-6.0.pom
>   (SHA1: ea17ee1b2c28804437212970ea2d273efeb3807e)
> 
> I have tested this with JDK 7, 8 using Maven 3.3.9.
> 
> Details of changes since 1.1 are in the release notes:
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC7/changes-report.html
> 
> Site:
>   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC7/
> (note some *relative* links are broken and the 6.0 directories are not yet
> created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)
> 
> Clirr Report (compared to 5.2):
>   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC7/clirr-report.html
> 
> Note that Clirr reports several errors.
> These are considered OK for the reasons stated below.
> These exceptions are also noted in the Changes and Release Notes.
> 
> Errors reported:
> - methods added to org.apache.bcel.classfile.Visitor interface: OK because
> that does not affect binary compatibility.
> - Removed java.io.Serializable from all classes: OK, because we don't
> expect anybody to rely on serialization for BCEL classes
> - Return type of method 'public java.lang.Object getElementAt(int)' has
> been changed to java.lang.String in class
> org.apache.bcel.verifier.VerifierFactoryListModel: OK, because this class
> is part of an UI application and for this reason should only used by Swing.
> 
> RAT Report:
>   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC7/rat-report.html
> 
> KEYS:
>   https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> 
> Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no
> sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. sometime after 21:00 CEST 05-July 2016
> 
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> 
> Thanks!
> Benedikt
> 



Mime
View raw message