Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44253200AF7 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:06:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 42B38160A47; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C3B01602C5 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:06:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 37566 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2016 07:06:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 37555 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2016 07:06:24 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:06:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EA2861805B3 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:06:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.127 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.127 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TzNue_q_U2tI for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 989C95F5A1 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bCiQN-0007x6-IB for dev@commons.apache.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:06:11 +0200 Received: from mail.bpm-inspire.com ([80.153.137.132]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:06:11 +0200 Received: from joerg.schaible by mail.bpm-inspire.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:06:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@commons.apache.org From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmc=?= Schaible Subject: Re: [ALL] About binary compatibility Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:03:30 +0200 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <5754668F.7080900@apache.org> <4cdd3f7c-b2fa-171c-02b0-68e1e510d7e1@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mail.bpm-inspire.com User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10 archived-at: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:06:26 -0000 Hi, James Carman wrote: > Agree we should have a "source of truth". Is there something wrong with > using an "internal" or "impl" package name? The bundle plugin for OSGi > doesn't export these by default, which would be a nice side effect! :). While it is a step in the right direction, a package scoped solution does not solve the problem of a public interface that should not be implemented directly (as we've seen with the BCEL visitor). Time for Java 8 and its default implementations ... Cheers, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org