Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B52200B34 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 00:36:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id C24D6160A61; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 18357160A62 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 00:36:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 95017 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2016 22:36:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 94558 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2016 22:36:08 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:36:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3E2B81A0149; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:36:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.72 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=scarlet.be Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ScicB5tBYVee; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eir.is.scarlet.be (eir.is.scarlet.be [193.74.71.27]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 559835F19D; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:36:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=scarlet.be; s=scarlet; t=1466202959; bh=8k98PPXZcraQwexas0oTjBCaATxmhA6xguUG2TphhCI=; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To: Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID; b=aKgAnO08ko/fRBZmqYewGYre1MmSY1spaSzTx9pcKph3s6D5cGbENx142Km0Js0p9 yJ/mRERocSLmRsOxuMDrpXRE2A4loaxN/uLOIqQgvCAQc+b7N02Ss1VntCMf8mVS47 sRkA+SCN0FDwK9HaJzcgE6cR/ZdkJzWxPCWMhWG4= Received: from webmail.scarlet.be (gresham.is.scarlet.be [193.74.71.215]) by eir.is.scarlet.be (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u5HMZwEX012879; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 00:35:59 +0200 X-Scarlet: d=1466202959 c=193.74.71.215 Received: from ip-213-49-235-183.dsl.scarlet.be ([213.49.235.183]) via ip-213-49-235-183.dsl.scarlet.be ([213.49.235.183]) by webmail.scarlet.be with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Sat, 18 Jun 2016 00:35:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 00:35:58 +0200 From: Gilles To: Cc: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math =?UTF-8?Q?IPMC=3F?= In-Reply-To: References: <192d5c6fac17c0b60d1ef13399a83af8@scarlet.be> Message-ID: X-Sender: gilles@harfang.homelinux.org User-Agent: Scarlet Webmail X-DCC-scarlet.be-Metrics: eir; whitelist X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.1-exp at eir X-Virus-Status: Clean archived-at: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:36:12 -0000 On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:51:36 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: > Excuse me? > > See inline. > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Gilles > > wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:01:13 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >>> I thought this had been made clear. Several months Commons voted >>> to >>> make Math a TLP. But shortly after that most of the people involved >>> with Commons Math felt that a TLP at the ASF would not work for >>> them, >>> so they forked the project and left, effectively voiding the TLP >>> vote >>> since the proposed PMC is no longer valid. There is one person >>> left >>> who was very involved in Commons Math and a few other people who >>> have >>> expressed interest in joining the new community. >>> >>> So this is a situation where we have an already existing code base >>> where a lot of the people left are not familiar with quite a bit of >>> it. The new group of people who are interested are trying to >>> determine how they should move forward. There is some talk of >>> breaking >>> Commons Math into smaller components and possibly dropping some >>> where >>> there is no one to maintain it. >>> >> >> The "Commons" project not being interested in hosting those >> components, >> is the "incubator" a good place for the developers wishing to go in >> that >> direction? >> > > Perhaps before we move to next steps, could you provide some links to > the > discussion where it was decided that Commons is not interested in > hosting > these components? I proposed to concretely examine this possibility in more than one message: http://markmail.org/message/ye6wvqvlvnqe4qrp http://markmail.org/message/3gupcednhqtcfepw http://markmail.org/message/3kob7djjicax6rgn http://markmail.org/message/7rb2mxq7hhwzykvr And again in another thread: http://markmail.org/message/fnlta2ttfne3aj5f >> >> What's the next step? >> > > Let's get to a common understanding of what went before. Even that seems impossible. :-( Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org