Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79ACE200B29 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:12:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 7844F160A63; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C2342160A06 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:12:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 82872 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2016 15:12:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 82860 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2016 15:12:31 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:12:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D34ADC034D for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:12:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ikmRpC4t2KR5 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com (mail-it0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1159D5FACC for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f6so71956782ith.0 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:12:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zLo3pq/T1AWw+q6SBnV2gata8g+zaFFkGI5B6BIzYYc=; b=JN8ZaV+5uDWr2z8xqQQEtdzodFLCJA2fYjglpaDqZnG6kXF0FcC2keJ/1NZRthl46G 0o5LI4sASt+YAsJpgmYKuk77lKNE8jpZQfTFOe7lW5X7ZHXPfM53o5DDPKTOJiN7Xnl+ MWPeKKObnr8tcCouNIU1fqdZs7/Q8vRTZ3548Xdv/Mokrmp/slzRJbtUDHIEpaA3swRK ZDhLwfzuC7+NknjV60YubaV0gUg0MpaEdQCiTmWIlMNsNV3fqvM9JUQ5oOTVmTN5DfJE xdvwGEJSWRqU7vHthjc04TyV2yc85yDfNcWq23lu86Wk+EhAbQqFgNUaAQsxWJIqdazR NV3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=zLo3pq/T1AWw+q6SBnV2gata8g+zaFFkGI5B6BIzYYc=; b=hPnztFN+baCA4kmSFKjnJ6Yz8TfbqimRoNokbW0HerlyBQoLBaad0al1zuYHW6uJcJ 3LQT3p8M1lJwmRwUNUZfJLK8sqpVljgsP2VUk0qAzWoKudYszTsHqF9g5s6qcdL8KUXe dBa0nHsG9bdMjJPFfYBPPkYH/7BdtvUGNDM8JW3Y3Co++kgxjiIrwDGZDREEUSe4sC41 9v7LjdThOL/+wkw/iwKzNy4BslhbzRqGvlTc+EJ9OTpQnfO471qu5/7+L67xNnv6F5M6 3oBpkaQ+xNCK9RR6+PxLBAvO3JGKzvR4uOju33nIqP6K3uONnNooJugLruL33a1TwTHE TYxg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKD88c3v431Skbv+OVuKotatt0GOjR+V9VXADpJ44cBM8Qs28kWk4TwzIkAWw/jfGhWrA8iUXutB+HbhA== X-Received: by 10.36.101.74 with SMTP id u71mr16121500itb.92.1467299548908; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:12:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.134.83 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:12:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9247ba48-21c8-cc0e-c35e-a6ce2a58d24c@apache.org> References: <9247ba48-21c8-cc0e-c35e-a6ce2a58d24c@apache.org> From: sebb Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:12:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] inconsistent naming CryptoRandomFactory.getCryptoRandom : CryptoCipherFactory.getInstance To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:12:33 -0000 On 30 June 2016 at 13:59, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Would it make sense to move the factory method to the base class? > > CryptoRandom random = CryptoRandom.getInstance(); It's an interface, not a base class. > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org