Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJcp7jtHzRaWq0qgDpZLmE6aJzdrgHebg8=rQTafEz=cQek99g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJcp7jsyAMwGoqVdgg7BUKkh1DnSb_rxg+n0aO8Zy7aNSfzXxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1cb8e992d0ef3aa2b118a3c12c579eef@scarlet.be> <CAF8HOZ+6uh5ytkVFoVJAwBwLwAGosf8f=M+wrFkP6Ye1SD3eAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <nkapgn$qtc$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAF8HOZK1OVLcW61s5Hn5EzBMjL8PTy-X_x+X+05jfXfeQLd3uA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJcp7jtHzRaWq0qgDpZLmE6aJzdrgHebg8=rQTafEz=cQek99g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:52:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF8HOZJ50Y8syVVM-9sZFfT+D-GGkzk2z2yQmQfZxhHNzZe+Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MATH] what a commons-TLP split could look like
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
archived-at: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:53:28 -0000

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Eric Barnhill <ericbarnhill@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think I made a respectable case for such a split in my thread titled
> apache,commons,math . Perhaps you could identify some points in that post
> that you disagree with? That's what others did.

As I wrote: I am trying to concentrate efforts into the relocation (or
move), rather than into technical details. Makes sense, IMO.

Jochen


-- 
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"

http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org