commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörg Schaible <>
Subject Re: [ALL] About binary compatibility
Date Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:03:30 GMT

James Carman wrote:

> Agree we should have a "source of truth". Is there something wrong with
> using an "internal" or "impl" package name? The bundle plugin for OSGi
> doesn't export these by default, which would be a nice side effect! :).

While it is a step in the right direction, a package scoped solution does 
not solve the problem of a public interface that should not be implemented 
directly (as we've seen with the BCEL visitor). Time for Java 8 and its 
default implementations ...


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message